38/1983
Kansainvälinen yleissopimus panttivankien ottamista vastaan
Internationell konvention mot tagande av gisslan
International Convention against the taking of hostages
Perustiedot
Sopimustyyppi: |
|
---|---|
Allekirjoituspäivä: | 17.12.1979 (New York) |
Ratifiointipäivä: | 14.04.1983 R |
Voimaantulopäivä: | 03.06.1983 |
Kansainvälinen voimaantulopäivä: | 03.06.1983 |
Sopimukset: | 38/1983 |
Säädösviitteet: | 613/1983 |
Osapuolet
AFGANISTAN
Sitoutumispäivä: 24.09.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 24.10.2003ALANKOMAAT
Sitoutumispäivä: 06.12.1988 RVoimaantulopäivä: -Varauma:Reservation:
"In cases where the judicial authorities of either the Netherlands, the Netherlands Antilles or Aruba cannot exercise jurisdiction pursuant to one of the principles mentioned in article 5, paragraph 1, the Kingdom accepts the aforesaid obligation [laid down in article 8] subject to the condition that it has received and rejected a request for extradition from another State party to the Convention."
Declaration:
"In the view of the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands article 15 of the Convention, and in particular the second sentence of that article, in no way affects the applicability of article 33 of the Convention of 28 July 1951 relating to the Status of Refugees."
Alueellinen soveltaminen: Sovelletaan myös Alankomaiden Antilleihin ja Arubaan.ALBANIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 22.01.2002 LVoimaantulopäivä: 21.02.2002ALGERIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 18.12.1996 LVoimaantulopäivä: 17.01.1997Varauma:Reservation:
The Government of the People´s Democratic Republic of Algeria does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1, of the [said Convention].
These provisions are not in accordance with the view of the Government of the People´s Democratic Republic of Algeria that the submission of a dispute to the International Court of Justice requires the prior agreement of all the parties concerned in each case.ANDORRA
Sitoutumispäivä: 23.09.2004 LVoimaantulopäivä: 23.10.2004ANTIGUA JA BARBUDA
Sitoutumispäivä: 06.08.1986 LVoimaantulopäivä: -ARABIEMIRAATTIEN LIITTO
Sitoutumispäivä: 24.09.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 24.10.2003ARGENTIINA
Sitoutumispäivä: 18.09.1991 LVoimaantulopäivä: 18.10.1991ARMENIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 16.03.2004 LVoimaantulopäivä: 15.04.2004AUSTRALIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 21.05.1990 LVoimaantulopäivä: -AZERBAIDZHAN
Sitoutumispäivä: 29.02.2000 LVoimaantulopäivä: 30.03.2000BAHAMA
Sitoutumispäivä: 04.06.1981 LVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983BAHRAIN
Sitoutumispäivä: 16.09.2005 LVoimaantulopäivä: 16.10.2005BANGLADESH
Sitoutumispäivä: 20.05.2005 LVoimaantulopäivä: 19.06.2005BARBADOS
Sitoutumispäivä: 09.03.1981 LVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983BELGIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 16.04.1999 RVoimaantulopäivä: 16.05.1999BELIZE
Sitoutumispäivä: 14.11.2001 LVoimaantulopäivä: 14.12.2001BENIN
Sitoutumispäivä: 31.07.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 30.08.2003BHUTAN
Sitoutumispäivä: 31.08.1981 LVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983BOLIVIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 07.01.2002 RVoimaantulopäivä: 06.02.2002BOSNIA-HERTSEGOVINA
Sitoutumispäivä: 01.09.1993 VSVoimaantulopäivä: 06.03.1992BOTSWANA
Sitoutumispäivä: 08.09.2000 LVoimaantulopäivä: 08.10.2000BRASILIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 08.03.2000 LVoimaantulopäivä: 07.04.2000Varauma:Reservation:
With the reservation provided under article 16 (2).BRUNEI
Sitoutumispäivä: 18.10.1988 LVoimaantulopäivä: -BULGARIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 10.03.1988 LVoimaantulopäivä: -Varauma:Declaration on article 9, paragraph 1:
The People´s Republic of Bulgaria condemns all acts of international terrorism, whose victims are not only governmental and public officials but also many innocent people, including mothers, children, old-aged, and which exerts an increasingly destabilizing impact on international relations, complicates considerably the political solution of crisis situations, irrespective of the reasons invoked to explain terrorist acts. The People´s Republic of Bulgaria considers that article 9, paragraph 1 of the Convention should be applied in a manner consistent with the stated aims of the Convention, which include the development of international co-operation in adopting effective measures for the prevention, prosecution and punishment of all acts of hostage-taking as manifestations of international terrorism, including extradition of alleged offenders.BURKINA FASO
Sitoutumispäivä: 01.10.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 31.10.2003CHILE
Sitoutumispäivä: 12.11.1981 RVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983Varauma:The Government of the Republic [of Chile], having approved this Convention, states that such approval is given on the understanding that the aforesaid Convention prohibits the taking of hostages in any circumstances, even those referred to in article 12.
COSTA RICA
Sitoutumispäivä: 24.01.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: -DJIBOUTI
Sitoutumispäivä: 01.06.2004 LVoimaantulopäivä: -DOMINICA
Sitoutumispäivä: 09.09.1986 LVoimaantulopäivä: -Varauma:Understanding:
"The aforesaid Convention prohibits the taking of hostages in any circumstances, even those referred to in article 12."DOMINIKAANINEN TASAVALTA
Sitoutumispäivä: 03.10.2007 RVoimaantulopäivä: 02.11.2007ECUADOR
Sitoutumispäivä: 02.05.1988 LVoimaantulopäivä: -EGYPTI
Sitoutumispäivä: 02.10.1981 RVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983EL SALVADOR
Sitoutumispäivä: 12.02.1981 RVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983Varauma:Upon signature:
With the reservation permitted under article 16 (2) of the said Convention.
Upon ratification:
Reservation with respect to the application of the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention.ESPANJA
Sitoutumispäivä: 26.03.1984 LVoimaantulopäivä: -ETELÄ-AFRIKKA
Sitoutumispäivä: 23.09.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 23.10.2003ETELÄ-KOREA
Sitoutumispäivä: 04.05.1983 LVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983ETIOPIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 16.04.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 16.05.2003Varauma:Reservation pursuant to article 16 (2):
"The Government of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia does not consider itself bound by the aforementioned provision of the Convention, under which any dispute between two or more States Parties concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention shall, at the request of one of them, be submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice, and states that disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention would be submitted to arbitration or to the Court only with the prior consent of all the parties concerned."FIDZHI
Sitoutumispäivä: 15.05.2008 LVoimaantulopäivä: 14.06.2008FILIPPIINIT
Sitoutumispäivä: 14.10.1980 RVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983GABON
Sitoutumispäivä: 19.04.2005 RVoimaantulopäivä: 19.05.2005GEORGIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 18.02.2004 LVoimaantulopäivä: 19.03.2004GHANA
Sitoutumispäivä: 10.11.1987 LVoimaantulopäivä: -GRENADA
Sitoutumispäivä: 10.12.1990 LVoimaantulopäivä: 09.01.1991GUATEMALA
Sitoutumispäivä: 11.03.1983 RVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983GUINEA
Sitoutumispäivä: 22.12.2004 LVoimaantulopäivä: 21.01.2005GUINEA-BISSAU
Sitoutumispäivä: 06.08.2008 LVoimaantulopäivä: 05.09.2008GUYANA
Sitoutumispäivä: 12.09.2007 LVoimaantulopäivä: 12.10.2007HAITI
Sitoutumispäivä: 17.05.1989 RVoimaantulopäivä: -HONDURAS
Sitoutumispäivä: 01.06.1981 RVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983HONGKONG
Sitoutumispäivä: -Voimaantulopäivä: -INTIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 07.09.1994 LVoimaantulopäivä: 07.10.1994Varauma:Reservation:
"The Government of the Republic of India declares that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 1 of article 16 which establishes compulsory arbitration or adjudication by the International Court of Justice concerning disputes between two or more States Parties relating to the interpretation or application of this Convention at the request of one of them."IRAK
Sitoutumispäivä: 26.08.2013 RVoimaantulopäivä: 25.09.2013IRAN
Sitoutumispäivä: 20.11.2006 LVoimaantulopäivä: 20.12.2006Varauma:Reservation
Pursuant to Article 16, paragraph 2 of the International Convention against the Taking of Hostages, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention regarding the reference of any dispute concerning the interpretation, or application of this Convention, which is not settled by negotiation to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice.
Interpretative declaration
The Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran declares its categorical condemnation of each and every act of terrorism, including taking innocent civilians as hostages, which violates human rights and fundamental freedom of human kind, undermines the stability and security of human communities, and hinders countries from development and progress. The Islamic Republic of Iran believes that elimination of terrorism requires a comprehensive campaign by the international community to identify and eradicate political, economic, social and international root causes of the scourge.
The Islamic Republic of Iran further believes that fighting terrorism should not affect the legitimate struggle of peoples under colonial domination and foreign occupation in the exercise of their right of self-determination, as enshrined in a variety of international documents, including the Charter of the United Nations, the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, and Article 1 paragraph 4 of the Protocol I Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts.IRLANTI
Sitoutumispäivä: 30.06.2005 LVoimaantulopäivä: 30.07.2005ISLANTI
Sitoutumispäivä: 06.07.1981 LVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983ISO-BRITANNIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 22.12.1982 RVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983Varauma:Alueellinen soveltaminen: Sovelletaan kaikkiin Ison-Britannian hallinnassa oleviin alueisiin.
ITALIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 20.03.1986 RVoimaantulopäivä: -Varauma:Upon signature:
The Italian Government declares that, because of the differing interpretations to which certain formulations in the text lend themselves, Italy reserves the right, when depositing the instrument of ratification, to invoke article 19 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969 in conformity with the general principles of international law.ITÄVALTA
Sitoutumispäivä: 22.08.1986 RVoimaantulopäivä: -JAMAIKA
Sitoutumispäivä: 09.08.2005 RVoimaantulopäivä: 08.09.2005JAPANI
Sitoutumispäivä: 08.06.1987 RVoimaantulopäivä: -JEMEN
Sitoutumispäivä: 14.07.2000 LVoimaantulopäivä: -JORDANIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 19.02.1986 LVoimaantulopäivä: -Varauma:"The Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan declares that their accession to the International Convention against the Taking of Hostages can in no way be construed as constituting recognition of, or entering into treaty relations with the ´state of Israel´.
KAMBODZHA
Sitoutumispäivä: 27.07.2006 LVoimaantulopäivä: 26.08.2006KAMERUN
Sitoutumispäivä: 09.03.1988 LVoimaantulopäivä: -KANADA
Sitoutumispäivä: 04.12.1985 RVoimaantulopäivä: -KAP VERDE
Sitoutumispäivä: 10.09.2002 LVoimaantulopäivä: 10.10.2002KAZAKSTAN
Sitoutumispäivä: 21.02.1996 LVoimaantulopäivä: 22.03.1996KENIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 08.12.1981 LVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983Varauma:"The Government of the Republic of Kenya does not consider herself bound by the provisions of paragraph (1) of the article 16 of the Convention."
KESKI-AFRIKAN TASAVALTA
Sitoutumispäivä: 09.07.2007 LVoimaantulopäivä: 08.08.2007KIINA
Sitoutumispäivä: 26.01.1993 LVoimaantulopäivä: 25.02.1993Varauma:Reservation:
The People´s Republic of China makes its reservation to article 16, paragraph 1, and does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1, of the Convention.
Alueellinen soveltaminen: Sovelletaan myös Hongkongiin 1.7.1997 lukien ja Macaoon 20.12.1999 lukien.KIRGISIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 02.10.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 01.11.2003KIRIBATI
Sitoutumispäivä: 15.09.2005 LVoimaantulopäivä: 15.10.2005KOLUMBIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 14.04.2005 LVoimaantulopäivä: 14.05.2005Varauma:Reservation
In accordance with article 16(2) of the Convention, Colombia does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16(1).KOMORIT
Sitoutumispäivä: 25.09.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 25.10.2003KREIKKA
Sitoutumispäivä: 18.06.1987 RVoimaantulopäivä: -KROATIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 23.09.2003 VSVoimaantulopäivä: 08.10.1991KUUBA
Sitoutumispäivä: 15.11.2001 LVoimaantulopäivä: 15.12.2001Varauma:Reservation:
The Republic of Cuba declares, pursuant to article 16, paragraph 2, that it does not consider itself bound by paragraph 1 of the said article, concerning the settlement of disputes arising between States Parties, inasmuch as it considers that such disputes must be settled through amicable negotiation. In consequence, it reiterates that it does not recognize the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice.KUWAIT
Sitoutumispäivä: 06.02.1989 LVoimaantulopäivä: -Varauma:Declaration:
It is understood that the accession to this Convention does not mean in any way a recognition of Israel by the Government of the State of Kuwait.
Furthermore, no treaty relations will arise between the State of Kuwait and Israel.KYPROS
Sitoutumispäivä: 13.09.1991 LVoimaantulopäivä: 13.10.1991LAOS
Sitoutumispäivä: 22.08.2002 LVoimaantulopäivä: 21.09.2002Varauma:Reservation:
"In accordance with paragraph 2, Article 16 of the International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages, the Lao People´s Democratic Republic does not consider itself bound by paragraph 1, article 16 of the present Convention. The Lao People´s Democratic Republic declares that to refer a dispute relating to interpretation and application of the present Convention to arbitration or International Court of Justice, the agreement of all parties concerned in the dispute is necessary."LATVIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 14.11.2002 LVoimaantulopäivä: 14.12.2002LESOTHO
Sitoutumispäivä: 05.11.1980 RVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983LIBANON
Sitoutumispäivä: 04.12.1997 LVoimaantulopäivä: 03.01.1998Varauma:Declaration:
1. The accession of the Lebanese Republic to the Convention shall not constitute recognition of Israel, just as the application of the Convention shall not give rise to relations or cooperation of any kind with it.
2. The provisions of the Convention, and in particular those of its article 13, shall not affect the Lebanese Republic´s stance of supporting the right of States and peoples to oppose and resist foreign occupation of their territories.LIBERIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 05.03.2003 RVoimaantulopäivä: 04.04.2003LIBYA
Sitoutumispäivä: 25.09.2000 LVoimaantulopäivä: 25.10.2000LIECHTENSTEIN
Sitoutumispäivä: 28.11.1994 LVoimaantulopäivä: 28.12.1994Varauma:Interpretative declaration:
The Principality of Liechtenstein construes article 4 of the Convention to mean that the Principality of Liechtenstein undertakes to fulfil the obligations contained therein under the conditions laid down in its domestic legislation.LIETTUA
Sitoutumispäivä: 02.02.2001 LVoimaantulopäivä: 04.03.2001LUXEMBURG
Sitoutumispäivä: 29.04.1991 RVoimaantulopäivä: 29.05.1991MACAO
Sitoutumispäivä: -Voimaantulopäivä: -MADAGASKAR
Sitoutumispäivä: 24.09.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 24.10.2003MAKEDONIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 12.03.1998 VSVoimaantulopäivä: 17.11.1991MALAWI
Sitoutumispäivä: 17.03.1986 LVoimaantulopäivä: -Varauma:"While the Government of the Republic of Malawi accepts the principles in article 16, this acceptance would nonetheless be read in conjunction with [the] declaration [made by the President and the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Malawi] of 12 December, 1966 upon recognition as compulsory, the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice under article 36, paragraph 2, of the State of the Court."
MALESIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 29.05.2007 LVoimaantulopäivä: 28.06.2007Varauma:Declarations and reservation
1. The Government of Malaysia understands the phrase 'preliminary inquiry into the facts' in Article 6(1) of the Convention to mean a reference to the criminal investigation by the relevant law enforcement authority before a decision is made whether to institute a prosecution against the alleged offender for the offences under the Convention.
2. The Government of Malaysia understands Article 8(1) of the Convention to include the right of the competent authorities to decide not to submit any particular case for prosecution before the judicial authorities if the alleged offender is dealt with under national security and preventive detention laws.
3. (a) Pursuant to Article 16(2) of the Convention, the Government of Malaysia declares that it does not consider itself bound by article 16(1) of the Convention; and
(b) The Government of Malaysia reserves the right specifically to agree in a particular case to follow the arbitration procedure set forth in Article 16(1) of the Convention or any other procedure for arbitration.MALI
Sitoutumispäivä: 08.02.1990 LVoimaantulopäivä: -MALTA
Sitoutumispäivä: 11.11.2001 LVoimaantulopäivä: 11.12.2001MAROKKO
Sitoutumispäivä: 09.05.2007 LVoimaantulopäivä: 08.06.2007MARSHALLINSAARET
Sitoutumispäivä: 27.01.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 26.02.2003MAURITANIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 13.03.1998 LVoimaantulopäivä: 12.04.1998MAURITIUS
Sitoutumispäivä: 17.10.1980 RVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983MEKSIKO
Sitoutumispäivä: 28.04.1987 LVoimaantulopäivä: -Varauma:In relation to article 16, the United Mexican States adhere to the scope and limitations established by the Government of Mexico on 7 November 1945, at the time when it ratified the Charter of the United Nations and the Statute of the International Court of Justice.
6 August 1987
The Government of Mexico subsequently specified that the said declaration should be understood to mean that, in so far as article 16 is concerned, the United Mexican States accede subject to the limits and restrictions laid down by the Mexican Government when recognizing, on 23 October 1947, the compulsory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in accordance with article 36, paragraph 2, of the State of the Court.MIKRONESIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 06.07.2004 LVoimaantulopäivä: 05.08.2004MOLDOVA
Sitoutumispäivä: 10.10.2002 LVoimaantulopäivä: 09.11.2002Varauma:Reservation:
Pursuant to article 16, paragraph 2 of the International Convention against the Taking of Hostages, the Republic of Moldova declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention.MONACO
Sitoutumispäivä: 16.10.2001 LVoimaantulopäivä: 15.11.2001MONGOLIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 09.06.1992 LVoimaantulopäivä: 09.07.1992MONTENEGRO
Sitoutumispäivä: 23.10.2006 VSVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.2006Varauma:Confirmed upon succession:
Declaration:
"The [Government of Yugoslavia] herewith states that the provisions of Article 9 of the Convention should be interpreted and applied in practice in the way which would not bring into question the goals of the Convention, i.e. undertaking of efficient measures for the prevention of all acts of the taking of hostages as a phenomenon of international terrorism, as well as the prosecution, punishment and extradition of persons considered to have perpetrated this criminal offence."MOSAMBIK
Sitoutumispäivä: 14.01.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 13.02.2003Varauma:Declaration:
"... with the following declaration in accordance with its article 16, paragraph 2:
"The Republic of Mozambique does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16 paragraph 1 of the Convention.
In this connection, the Republic of Mozambique states that, in each individual case, the consent of all Parties to such a dispute is necessary for the submission of the dispute to arbitration or to [the] International Court of Justice."
Furthermore, the Republic of Mozambique declares that:
"The Republic of Mozambique, in accordance with its Constitution and domestic laws, can not extradite Mozambique citizens.
Therefore, Mozambique citizens will be tried and sentenced in national courts."MYANMAR
Sitoutumispäivä: 04.06.2004 LVoimaantulopäivä: 04.07.2004Varauma:Reservation:
"The Government of the Union of Myanmar does not consider itself bound by the article 16 (1) of the International Convention against the Taking of Hostages adopted on 17 December 1979."NAMIBIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 02.09.2016 LVoimaantulopäivä: 02.10.2016NAURU
Sitoutumispäivä: 02.08.2005 LVoimaantulopäivä: 01.09.2005NEPAL
Sitoutumispäivä: 09.03.1990 LVoimaantulopäivä: -NICARAGUA
Sitoutumispäivä: 24.09.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 24.10.2003NIGER
Sitoutumispäivä: 26.10.2004 LVoimaantulopäivä: 25.11.2004NIGERIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 24.09.2013 LVoimaantulopäivä: 24.10.2013NIUE
Sitoutumispäivä: 22.06.2009 LVoimaantulopäivä: 22.07.2009NORJA
Sitoutumispäivä: 02.07.1981 RVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983NORSUNLUURANNIKKO
Sitoutumispäivä: 22.08.1989 LVoimaantulopäivä: -OMAN
Sitoutumispäivä: 22.07.1988 LVoimaantulopäivä: -PAKISTAN
Sitoutumispäivä: 08.09.2000 LVoimaantulopäivä: 08.10.2000PALAU
Sitoutumispäivä: 14.11.2001 LVoimaantulopäivä: 14.12.2001PANAMA
Sitoutumispäivä: 19.08.1982 RVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983PAPUA-UUSI-GUINEA
Sitoutumispäivä: 30.09.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 30.10.2003PARAGUAY
Sitoutumispäivä: 22.09.2004 LVoimaantulopäivä: 22.10.2004PERU
Sitoutumispäivä: 06.07.2001 LVoimaantulopäivä: 05.08.2001POHJOIS-KOREA
Sitoutumispäivä: 12.11.2001 LVoimaantulopäivä: 12.12.2001Varauma:Reservations:
... with the following reservations:
1. The Democratic People´s Republic of Korea does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention.
2. The Democratic People´s Republic of Korea does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 5, paragraph 3 of the Convention.PORTUGALI
Sitoutumispäivä: 06.07.1984 RVoimaantulopäivä: -PUOLA
Sitoutumispäivä: 25.05.2000 LVoimaantulopäivä: 24.06.2000PÄIVÄNTASAAJAN GUINEA
Sitoutumispäivä: 07.02.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 09.03.2003QATAR
Sitoutumispäivä: 11.09.2012 LVoimaantulopäivä: 11.10.2012Varauma:Reservation
...the State of Qatar accede[s] to the Convention Against the Taking of Hostages of 1979, with reservation [to] paragraph 1 of article 16 of the Convention.RANSKA
Sitoutumispäivä: 09.06.2000 LVoimaantulopäivä: 09.07.2000Varauma:Declarations:
1. France considers that the act of hostage-taking is prohibited in all circumstances.
2. With regard to the application of article 6, France, in accordance with the principles of its penal procedure, does not intend to take an alleged offender into custody or to take any other coercive measures prior to the institution of criminal proceedings, except in cases where pre-trial detention has been requested.
3. With regard to the application of article 9, extradition will not be granted if the person whose extradition is requested was a French national at the time of the events or, in the case of a foreign national, if the offence is punishable by the death penalty under the laws of the requesting State, unless that State gives what are deemed to be adequate assurances that the death penalty will not be imposed or, if a death sentence is passed, that it will not be carried out.ROMANIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 17.05.1990 LVoimaantulopäivä: -RUANDA
Sitoutumispäivä: 13.05.2002 LVoimaantulopäivä: 12.06.2002RUOTSI
Sitoutumispäivä: 15.01.1981 RVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983SAINT KITTS JA NEVIS
Sitoutumispäivä: 17.01.1991 LVoimaantulopäivä: 16.02.1991SAINT LUCIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 17.10.2012 LVoimaantulopäivä: 16.11.2012Varauma:Reservations
1. In accordance with Article 16 of paragraph 2 of the Convention, the Government of Saint Lucia does not consider itself bound by the arbitration procedures established under Article 16 paragraph 1, of the Convention.
2. That the explicit expressed consent of the Government of Saint Lucia would be necessary for any submission of any dispute to arbitration [or] to the International Court of Justice.SAINT VINCENT JA GRENADIINIT
Sitoutumispäivä: 12.09.2000 LVoimaantulopäivä: 12.10.2000SAKSA
Sitoutumispäivä: 15.12.1980 RVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983SAMBIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 17.10.2016 LVoimaantulopäivä: 16.11.2016SAN MARINO
Sitoutumispäivä: 16.12.2014 LVoimaantulopäivä: 15.01.2015SAO TOME JA PRINCIPE
Sitoutumispäivä: 23.08.2006 LVoimaantulopäivä: 22.09.2006SAUDI-ARABIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 08.01.1991 LVoimaantulopäivä: 07.02.1991Varauma:Reservation:
1. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia does not consider itself obligated with the provision of paragraph 1, of article 16, of the Convention concerning arbitration.
Declaration:
2. The accession of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to this Convention does not constitute a recognition of Israel and does not lead to entering into any transactions or the establishment of any relations based on this Convention.SENEGAL
Sitoutumispäivä: 10.03.1987 RVoimaantulopäivä: -SERBIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 12.03.2001 VSVoimaantulopäivä: 27.04.1992Varauma:Confirmed upon succession:
Declaration:
"The [Government of Yugoslavia] herewith states that the provisions of Article 9 of the Convention should be interpreted and applied in practice in the way which would not bring into question the goals of the Convention, i.e. undertaking of efficient measures for the prevention of all acts of the taking of hostages as a phenomenon of international terrorism, as well as the prosecution, punishment and extradition of persons considered to have perpetrated this criminal offence."SEYCHELLIT
Sitoutumispäivä: 12.11.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 12.12.2003SIERRA LEONE
Sitoutumispäivä: 26.09.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 26.10.2003SINGAPORE
Sitoutumispäivä: 22.10.2010 LVoimaantulopäivä: 21.11.2010Varauma:Reservation and Declaration
Pursuant to Article 16, paragraph 2, of the Convention, the Republic of Singapore declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of Article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention.
The Republic of Singapore understands Article 8(1) of the Convention to include the right of competent authorities to decide not to submit any particular case for prosecution before the judicial authorities if the alleged offender is dealt with under national security and preventive detention laws.SLOVAKIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 28.05.1993 VSVoimaantulopäivä: 01.01.1993SLOVENIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 06.07.1992 VSVoimaantulopäivä: 25.06.1991SRI LANKA
Sitoutumispäivä: 08.09.2000 LVoimaantulopäivä: 08.10.2000SUDAN
Sitoutumispäivä: 19.06.1990 LVoimaantulopäivä: -SURINAM
Sitoutumispäivä: 05.11.1981 RVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983SVEITSI
Sitoutumispäivä: 05.03.1985 RVoimaantulopäivä: -Varauma:Declaration:
The Swiss Federal Council interprets article 4 of the Con-vention to mean that Switzerland undertakes to fulfil the obligations contained therein in the conditions specified by its domestic legislation.SWAZIMAA
Sitoutumispäivä: 04.04.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 04.05.2003TADZHIKISTAN
Sitoutumispäivä: 06.05.2002 LVoimaantulopäivä: 05.06.2002TANSANIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 22.01.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 21.02.2003TANSKA
Sitoutumispäivä: 11.08.1987 LVoimaantulopäivä: -THAIMAA
Sitoutumispäivä: 02.10.2007 LVoimaantulopäivä: 01.11.2007Varauma:Reservation
The Government of the Kingdom of Thailand does not consider itself bound by Article 16, paragraph 1 of the Convention.TOGO
Sitoutumispäivä: 25.07.1986 RVoimaantulopäivä: -TONGA
Sitoutumispäivä: 09.12.2002 LVoimaantulopäivä: 08.01.2003TRINIDAD JA TOBAGO
Sitoutumispäivä: 01.04.1981 LVoimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1983TSHAD
Sitoutumispäivä: 01.11.2006 LVoimaantulopäivä: 01.12.2006TSHEKKI
Sitoutumispäivä: 22.02.1993 VSVoimaantulopäivä: 01.01.1993TUNISIA
Sitoutumispäivä: 18.06.1997 LVoimaantulopäivä: 18.07.1997Varauma:Reservation:
[The Government of the Republic of Tunisia] declares that it does not consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph 1 of article 16 and states that disputes concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention can only be submitted to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice with the prior consent of all the Parties concerned.TURKKI
Sitoutumispäivä: 15.08.1989 LVoimaantulopäivä: -Varauma:Reservation:
In acceding to the Convention the Government of the Republic of Turkey, under article 16 (2) of the Convention declares that it doesn´t consider itself bound by the provisions of paragraph (1) of the said article.TURKMENISTAN
Sitoutumispäivä: 25.06.1999 LVoimaantulopäivä: 25.07.1999UGANDA
Sitoutumispäivä: 05.11.2003 RVoimaantulopäivä: 05.12.2003UKRAINA
Sitoutumispäivä: 19.06.1987 LVoimaantulopäivä: -Varauma:The Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic does not consider itself bound by article 16, paragraph 1, of the International Convention against the Taking of Hostages and declares that, in order for any dispute between parties to the Convention concerning the interpretation or application thereof to be referred to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice, the consent of all parties to the dispute must be secured in each individual case.
The Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic condemns international terrorism, which takes the lives of innocent people, constitutes a threat to their freedom and personal inviolability and destabilizes the international situation, whatever the motives used to explain terrorist actions. Accordingly, the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic considers that article 9, paragraph 1, of the Convention should be applied in a manner consistent with the stated aims of the Convention, which include the development of international co-operation in adopting effective measures for the prevention, prosecution and punishment of all acts of hostage-taking as manifestations of international terrorism through, inter alia, the extradition of alleged offenders.UNKARI
Sitoutumispäivä: 02.09.1987 LVoimaantulopäivä: -URUGUAY
Sitoutumispäivä: 04.03.2003 LVoimaantulopäivä: 03.04.2003UUSI-SEELANTI
Sitoutumispäivä: 12.11.1985 RVoimaantulopäivä: -Varauma:Alueellinen soveltaminen: Ei sovelleta Tokelauhun.
UZBEKISTAN
Sitoutumispäivä: 19.01.1998 LVoimaantulopäivä: 18.02.1998VALKO-VENÄJÄ
Sitoutumispäivä: 01.07.1987 LVoimaantulopäivä: -Varauma:The Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic does not consider itself bound by article 16, paragraph 1, of the International Convention against the Taking of Hostages and declares that, in order for any dispute between parties to the Convention concerning the interpretation or application thereof to be referred to arbitration or to the International Court of Justice, the consent of all parties to the dispute must be secured in each individual case.
The Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic condemns international terrorism, which takes the lives of innocent people, constitutes a threat to their freedom and personal inviolability and destabilizes the international situation, whatever the motives used to explain terrorist actions. Accordingly, the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic considers that article 9, paragraph 1, of the Convention should be applied in a manner consistent with the stated aims of the Convention, which include the development of international co-operation in adopting effective measures for the prevention, prosecution and punishment of all acts of hostage-taking as manifestations of international terrorism through, inter alia, the extradition of alleged offenders.VENEZUELA
Sitoutumispäivä: 13.12.1988 LVoimaantulopäivä: -Varauma:Declaration:
The Republic of Venezuela declares that it is not bound by the provisions of article 16, paragraph 1, of the Convention.VENÄJÄ
Sitoutumispäivä: 11.06.1987 LVoimaantulopäivä: -Varauma:The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics condemns international terrorism, which takes the lives of innocent people, constitutes a threat to their freedom and personal inviolability and destabilizes the international situation, whatever the motives used to explain terrorist actions. Accordingly, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic considers that article 9, paragraph 1, of the Convention should be applied in a manner consistent with the stated aims of the Convention, which include the development of international co-operation in adopting effective measures for the prevention, prosecution and punishment of all acts of hostage-taking as manifestations of international terrorism through, inter alia, the extradition of alleged offenders.
VIETNAM
Sitoutumispäivä: 09.01.2014 LVoimaantulopäivä: 08.02.2014Varauma:Reservation:
The Socialist Republic of Viet Nam does not consider itself bound by the provisions of
paragraph 1 of Article 16 of this Convention.â
Declaration:
â1. The Socialist Republic of Viet Nam declares that the provisions of the International
Convention against the Taking of Hostages are non-self-executing in Viet Nam. The Socialist Republic
of Viet Nam shall duly implement the provisions of the Convention through multilateral and bilateral
mechanisms, specific provisions in its domestic laws and regulations and on the basis of the principle of
reciprocity.
2. The Socialist Republic of Viet Nam, pursuant to Article 10 of this Convention, declares that
it shaII not take this Convention as the direct legal basis for extradition. The Socialist Republic of Viet
Nam shalI carry out extradition in accordance with the provisions of its domestic laws and regulations,
on the basis of treaties on extradition and the principle of reciprocity.âVIRO
Sitoutumispäivä: 08.03.2002 LVoimaantulopäivä: -YHDYSVALLAT
Sitoutumispäivä: 07.12.1984 RVoimaantulopäivä: -