32/1980

Valtiosopimusoikeutta koskeva Wienin yleissopimus

Wienkonvention om traktaträtten

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

Perustiedot

Sopimustyyppi:
II Monenväliset sopimukset
6. Valtio
6.3. oikeudellinen yhteistyö, rikollisuuden torjuminen, huumeet
Allekirjoituspäivä:

23.05.1969 (Wien)

Ratifiointipäivä:19.08.1977 R
Voimaantulopäivä:27.01.1980
Kansainvälinen voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
Sopimukset: 32/1980 33/1980
Säädösviitteet: 453/1980 454/1980

Sopimukseen tehdyt muutokset

  • 32/200127.4.2001Yleissopimukseen tehdyn selityksen peruuttaminen
  • 28/200120.4.2001Voimaansaattamisasetuksen 2 §:n muuttaminen

Osapuolet

  • ALANKOMAAT
    Sitoutumispäivä: 09.04.1985 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
    Varauma:

    Declaration:
    "The Kingdom of the Netherlands does not regard the provisions of Article 66 (b) of the Convention as providing "some other method of peaceful settlement" within the meaning of the declaration of the Kingdom of the Netherlands accepting as compulsory the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice which was deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations on 1 August 1956."

  • ALBANIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 27.06.2001 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.07.2001
  • ALGERIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 08.11.1988 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
    Varauma:

    Declaration:
    The accession of the People?s Democratic Republic of Algeria to the present Convention does not in any way mean recognition of Israel.
    This accession shall not be interpreted as involving the establishment of relations of any kind whatever with Israel.
    Reservation:
    The Government of the People?s Democratic Republic of Algeria considers that the competence of the International Court of Justice cannot be exercised with respect to a dispute such as that envisaged in article 66 (a) at the request of one of the parties alone.
    It declares that, in each case, the prior agreement of all the parties concerned is necessary for the dispute to be submitted to the said Court.

  • ANDORRA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 05.04.2004 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 05.05.2004
  • ARGENTIINA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 05.12.1972 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
    Varauma:

    (a) The Argentine Republic does not regard the rule contained in article 45 (b) as applicable to it inasmuch as the rule in question provides for the renunciation of rights in advance.
    (b) The Argentine Republic does not accept the idea that a fundamental change of circumstances which has occurred with regard to those existing at the time of the conclusion of a treaty, and which was not foreseen by the parties, may be invoked as a ground for terminating or withdrawing from the treaty; moreover, it objects to the reservations made by Afghanistan, Morocco and Syria with respect to article 62, paragraph 2 (a), and to any reservations to the same effect as those of the States referred to which may be made in the future with respect to article 62.
    The application of this Convention to territories whose sovereignty is a subject of dispute between two or more States, whether or not they are parties to it, cannot be deemed to imply a modification, renunciation or abandonment of the position heretofore maintained by each of them.

  • ARMENIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 17.05.2005 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 16.06.2005
    Varauma:

    The Republic of Armenia does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 66 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and declares that for any dispute among the Contracting Parties concerning the application or the interpretation of any article of part V of the Convention to be submitted to the International Court of Justice for a decision or to the Conciliation Commission for consideration the consent of all the parties to the dispute is required in each separate case.

  • AUSTRALIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 13.06.1974 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • AZERBAIDZHAN
    Sitoutumispäivä: 11.01.2018 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 10.02.2018
  • BARBADOS
    Sitoutumispäivä: 24.06.1971 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • BELGIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 01.09.1992 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 01.10.1992
    Varauma:

    21 June 1993
    Reservation:
    The Belgian State will not be bound by articles 53 and 64 of the Convention with regard to any party which, in formulating a reservation concerning article 66 (a), objects to the settlement procedure established by this article.

  • BENIN
    Sitoutumispäivä: 02.11.2017 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 02.12.2017
  • BOSNIA-HERTSEGOVINA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 01.09.1993 VS
    Voimaantulopäivä: 06.03.1992
  • BRASILIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 25.09.2009 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 25.10.2009
    Varauma:

    Reservation
    ...with a reservation to articles 25 and 66.

  • BULGARIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 21.04.1987 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
    Varauma:

    Declaration:
    The People?s Republic of Bulgaria considers it necessary to underline that articles 81 and 83 of the Convention, which pre- clude a number of States from becoming parties to it, are of an unjustifiably restrictive character. These provisions are incompatible with the very nature of the Convention, which is of a universal character and should be open for accession by all States.

  • BURKINA FASO
    Sitoutumispäivä: 25.05.2006 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 24.06.2006
  • CHILE
    Sitoutumispäivä: 09.04.1981 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
    Varauma:

    Reservation:
    The Republic of Chile declares its adherence to the general principle of the immutability of treaties, without prejudice to the right of States to stipulate, in particular, rules which modify this principle, and for this reason formulates a reservation relating to the provisions of article 62, paragraphs 1 and 3, of the Convention, which it considers inapplicable to Chile.

  • COSTA RICA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 22.11.1996 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 22.12.1996
    Varauma:

    Reservations and declarations made upon signature and confirmed upon ratification:
    1. With regard to articles 11 and 12, the delegation of Costa Rica wishes to make a reservation to the effect that the Costa Rican system of constitutional law does not authorize any form of consent which is not subject to ratification by the Legislative Assembly.
    2. With regard to article 25, it wishes to make a reservation to the effect that the Political Constitution of Costa Rica does not permit the provisional application of treaties, either.
    3. With regard to article 27, it interprets this article as refer ring to secondary law and not to the provisions of the Political Constitution.
    4. With regard to article 38, its interpretation is that no customary rule of general international law shall take precedence over any rule of the Inter-American System to which, in its view, this Convention is supplementary.

  • DOMINIKAANINEN TASAVALTA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 01.04.2010 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 01.05.2010
  • ECUADOR
    Sitoutumispäivä: 11.02.2003 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 13.03.2005
    Varauma:

    Declaration
    In ratifying this Convention, Ecuador wishes to place on record its adherence to the principles, norms and methods of peaceful settlement of disputes provided for in the Charter of the United Nations and in other international instruments on the subject, which have been expressly included in the Ecuadorian legal system in article 4, paragraph 3, of the Political Constitution of the Republic.

  • EGYPTI
    Sitoutumispäivä: 11.02.1982 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • ESPANJA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 16.05.1972 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • ETELÄ-KOREA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 27.04.1977 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • FILIPPIINIT
    Sitoutumispäivä: 15.11.1972 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • GABON
    Sitoutumispäivä: 05.11.2004 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 05.12.2004
  • GEORGIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 08.06.1995 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 08.07.1995
  • GUATEMALA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 21.07.1997 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 20.08.1997
    Varauma:

    Upon signature:
    Reservations:
    I. Guatemala cannot accept any provision of this Convention which would prejudice its rights and its claim to the Territory of Belize.
    II. Guatemala will not apply articles 25 and 66 in so far as they are contrary to the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic.
    III. Guatemala will apply the provision contained in article 38 only in cases where it considers that it is in the national interest to do so.
    Upon ratification:
    Reservations:
    (a) The Republic of Guatemala formally confirms reservations I and III which it formulated upon signing the [said Convention], to the effect, respectively, that Guatemala could not accept any provision of the Convention which would prejudice its rights and its claim to the territory of Belize and that it would apply the provision contained in article 38 of the Convention only in cases where it considered that it was in the national interest to do so;
    (b) With respect to reservation II, which was formulated on the same occasion and which indicated that the Republic of Guatemala would not apply articles 25 and 66 of the [said Convention] insofar as they were contrary to the Constitution, Guatemala states:
    (b) (I) That it confirms the reservation with respect to the non-application of articles 25 and 66 of the Convention, insofar as both are incompatible with provisions of the Political Constitution currently in force;
    (b) (II) -
    Guatemala?s consent to be bound by a treaty is subject to compliance with the requirements and procedures established in its Political Constitution. For Guatemala, the signature or initialling of a treaty by its representative is always understood to be ad referendum and subject, in either case, to confirmation by its Government.
    (c) A reservation is hereby formulated with respect to article 27 of the Convention, to the effect that the article is understood to refer to the provisions of the secondary legislation of Guatemala and not to those of its Political Constitution, which take precedence over any law or treaty.

  • GUINEA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 16.09.2005 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 16.10.2005
  • GUYANA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 15.09.2005 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 15.10.2005
  • HAITI
    Sitoutumispäivä: 25.08.1980 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • HONDURAS
    Sitoutumispäivä: 20.09.1979 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • IRLANTI
    Sitoutumispäivä: 07.08.2006 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 06.09.2006
  • ISO-BRITANNIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 25.06.1971 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
    Varauma:

    Upon signature:
    "In signing the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland declare their understanding that nothing in article 66 of the Convention is intended to oust the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice where such jurisdiction exists under any provisions in force binding the parties with regard to the settlement of disputes. In particular, and in relation to States parties to the Vienna Convention which accept as compulsory the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, the Government of the United Kingdom declare that they will not regard the provisions of sub-paragraph (b) of article 66 of the Vienna Convention as providing `some other method of peaceful settlement?? within the meaning of sub-paragraph (i) (a) of the Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom accepting as compulsory the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice which was deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations on the 1st of January 1969.
    "The Government of the United Kingdom, while reserving their position for the time being with regard to other declarations and reservations made by various States on signing the Convention, consider it necessary to state that the United Kingdom does not accept that Guatemala has any rights or any valid claim in respect of the territory of British Honduras."
    Upon ratification:
    It is [the United Kingdom?s] understanding that nothing in Article 66 of the Convention is intended to oust the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice where such jurisdiction exists under any provisions in force binding the parties with regard to the settlement of disputes. In particular, and in relation to States parties to the Vienna Convention which accept as compulsory the jurisdiction of the International Court, the United Kingdom will not regard the provisions of sub-paragraph (b) of Article 66 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties as providing ?some other method of peaceful settlement?? within the meaning of sub-paragraph (i) (a) of the Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom which was deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations on the 1st of January 1969.

  • ITALIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 25.07.1974 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • ITÄ-TIMOR
    Sitoutumispäivä: 08.01.2013 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 07.02.2013
  • ITÄVALTA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 30.04.1979 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • JAMAIKA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 28.07.1970 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • JAPANI
    Sitoutumispäivä: 02.07.1981 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • KAMERUN
    Sitoutumispäivä: 23.10.1991 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 22.11.1991
  • KANADA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 14.10.1970 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
    Varauma:

    "In acceding to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the Government of Canada declares its understanding that nothing in article 66 of the Convention is intended to exclude the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice where such jurisdiction exists under the provisions of any treaty in force binding the parties with regard to the settlement of disputes. In relation to states parties to the Vienna Convention which accept as compulsory the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, the Government of Canada declares that it does not regard the provisions of article 66 of the Vienna Convention as providing `some other method of peaceful settlement?? within the meaning of paragraph 2 (a) of the declaration of the Government of Canada accepting as compulsory the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice which was deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations on April 7, 1970."

  • KAZAKSTAN
    Sitoutumispäivä: 05.01.1994 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 04.02.1994
  • KESKI-AFRIKAN TASAVALTA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 10.12.1971 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • KIINA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 03.09.1997 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 03.10.1997
    Varauma:

    Reservation:
    1. The People?s Republic of China makes its reservation to article 66 of the said Convention.
    Declaration:
    2. The signature to the said Convention by the Taiwan authorities on 27 April 1970 in the name of "China" is illegal and therefore null and void.

  • KIRGISIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 11.05.1999 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 10.06.1999
  • KIRIBATI
    Sitoutumispäivä: 15.09.2005 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 15.10.2005
  • KOLUMBIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 10.04.1985 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
    Varauma:

    Reservation:
    With regard to article 25, Colombia formulates the reservation that the Political Constitution of Colombia does not recognize the provisional application of treaties; it is the responsibility of the National Congress to approve or disapprove any treaties and conventions which the Government concludes with other States or with international legal entities.

  • KONGO-BRAZZAVILLE
    Sitoutumispäivä: 12.04.1982 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • KONGO-KINSHASA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 25.07.1977 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • KREIKKA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 30.10.1974 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • KROATIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 12.10.1992 VS
    Voimaantulopäivä: 08.10.1991
  • KUUBA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 09.09.1998 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 09.10.1998
    Varauma:

    Reservation:
    The Government of the Republic of Cuba enters an explicit reservation to the procedure established under article 66 of the Convention, since it believes that any dispute should be settled by any means adopted by agreement between the parties to the dispute; the Republic of Cuba therefore cannot accept solutions which provide means for one of the parties, without the consent of the other to submit the dispute to procedures for judicial settlement, arbitration and conciliation.
    Declaration:
    The Government of the Republic of Cuba declares that the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties essentially codified and systematized the norms that had been established by custom and other sources of international law concerning negotiation, signature, ratification, entry into force, termination and other stipulations relating to international treaties; hence, those provisions, owing to their compulsory character, by virtue of having been established by universally recognized sources of international law, particularly those relating to invalidity, termination and suspension of the application of treaties, are applicable [to] any treaty negotiated by the Republic of Cuba prior to the aforesaid convention, essentially, treaties, covenants and concessions negotiated under conditions of inequality or which disregard or diminish its sovereignty and territorial integrity.

  • KUWAIT
    Sitoutumispäivä: 11.11.1975 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
    Varauma:

    The participation of Kuwait in this Convention does not mean in any way recognition of Israel by the Government of the State of Kuwait and that furthermore, no treaty relations will arise between the State of Kuwait and Israel.

  • KYPROS
    Sitoutumispäivä: 28.12.1976 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • LAOS
    Sitoutumispäivä: 31.03.1998 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 30.04.1998
  • LATVIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 04.05.1993 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 03.06.1993
  • LESOTHO
    Sitoutumispäivä: 03.03.1972 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • LIBERIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 29.08.1985 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • LIBYA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 22.12.2008 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 21.01.2009
  • LIECHTENSTEIN
    Sitoutumispäivä: 08.02.1990 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • LIETTUA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 15.01.1992 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 14.02.1992
  • LUXEMBURG
    Sitoutumispäivä: 23.05.2003 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 22.06.2003
  • MAKEDONIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 08.07.1999 VS
    Voimaantulopäivä: 17.11.1991
  • MALAWI
    Sitoutumispäivä: 23.08.1983 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • MALEDIIVIT
    Sitoutumispäivä: 14.09.2005 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 14.10.2005
  • MALESIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 27.07.1994 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 26.08.1994
  • MALI
    Sitoutumispäivä: 31.08.1998 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 30.09.1998
  • MALTA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 26.09.2012 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 26.10.2012
  • MAROKKO
    Sitoutumispäivä: 26.09.1972 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
    Varauma:

    Reservation made upon signature and confirmed upon ratifica tion:
    1. Morocco interprets paragraph 2 (a) of article 62 (Fundamental change of circumstances) as not applying to unlawful or inequitable treaties, or to any treaty contrary to the principle of self-determination. Morocco?s views on paragraph 2 (a) were supported by the Expert Consultant in his statements in the Committee of the Whole on 11 May1968 and before the Conference in plenary on 14 May 1969 (see Document A/CONF.39/L.40).
    2. It shall be understood that Morocco?s signature of this Convention does not in any way imply that it recognized Israel. Furthermore, no treaty relationships will be established between Morocco and Israel.

  • MAURITIUS
    Sitoutumispäivä: 18.01.1973 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • MEKSIKO
    Sitoutumispäivä: 25.09.1974 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • MOLDOVA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 26.01.1993 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 25.02.1993
  • MONGOLIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 16.05.1988 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
    Varauma:

    Declarations:
    1. The Mongolian People?s Republic declares that it reserves the right to take any measures to safeguard its interests in the case of the non-observance by other States of the provisions of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.
    2. The Mongolian People?s Republic deems it appropriate to draw attention to the discriminatory nature of article 81 and 83 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and declares that the Convention should be open for accession by all States.

  • MONTENEGRO
    Sitoutumispäivä: 23.10.2006 VS
    Voimaantulopäivä: 03.06.2006
  • MOSAMBIK
    Sitoutumispäivä: 08.05.2001 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 07.06.2001
  • MYANMAR
    Sitoutumispäivä: 16.09.1998 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 16.10.1998
  • NAURU
    Sitoutumispäivä: 05.05.1978 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • NIGER
    Sitoutumispäivä: 27.10.1971 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • NIGERIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 31.07.1969 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • OMAN
    Sitoutumispäivä: 18.10.1990 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
    Varauma:

    Declaration:
    According to the understanding of the Government of the Sultanate of Oman the implementation of paragraph (2) of article (62) of the said Convention does not include those Treaties which are contrary to the right to self-determination.

  • PALESTIINALAISALUEET
    Sitoutumispäivä: 02.04.2014 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 02.05.2014
  • PANAMA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 28.07.1980 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • PARAGUAY
    Sitoutumispäivä: 03.02.1972 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • PERU
    Sitoutumispäivä: 14.09.2000 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 14.10.2000
    Varauma:

    Reservation:
    For the Government of Peru, the application of articles 11, 12 and 25 of the Convention must be understood in accordance with, and subject to, the process of treaty signature, approval, ratification, accession and entry into force stipulated by its constitutional provisions.

  • PORTUGALI
    Sitoutumispäivä: 06.02.2004 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 07.03.2004
    Varauma:

    Declaration :
    "Article 66" of the Vienna of the Convention is inextricably linked with the provisions of Part V to which it relates. Therefore, Portugal declares that as to its relation with any State which has made or makes a reservation to the effect that this State will not be bound by some or all of the provisions of article 66, it will consider itself bound neither by those procedural norms nor by the substantive norms of Part V of the Convention to which the procedures provided for in Article 66 do not apply as a result of the said reservation. However, Portugal does not object to the entry into force of the remaining of the Convention between the Portuguese Republic and such a State and considers that the absence of treaty relations between itself and that State with regard to all or certain norms of Part V will not in any way impair the latter to fulfil any obligation embodied in those provisions to which it is subject under international law in dependently of the Convention".

  • PUOLA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 02.07.1990 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • RUANDA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 03.01.1980 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • RUOTSI
    Sitoutumispäivä: 04.02.1975 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • SAINT VINCENT JA GRENADIINIT
    Sitoutumispäivä: 27.04.1999 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.05.1999
  • SAKSA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 21.07.1987 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
    Varauma:

    Upon signature:
    "The Federal Republic of Germany reserves the right, upon ratifying the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, to state its views on the declarations made by other States upon signing or ratifying or acceding to that Convention and to make reservations regarding certain provisions of the said Convention."
    Upon ratification:
    . . .
    2. The Federal Republic of Germany assumes that the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice brought about by consent of States outside the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties cannot be excluded by invoking the provisions of article 66 (b) of the Convention.
    3. The Federal Republic of Germany interprets ??measures taken in conformity with the Charter of the United Nations??, as referred to in article 75, to mean future decisions by the Security Council of the United Nations in conformity with Chapter VII of the Charter for the maintenance of international peace and security.

  • SALOMONSAARET
    Sitoutumispäivä: 09.08.1989 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • SAUDI-ARABIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 14.04.2003 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 14.05.2003
    Varauma:

    Reservation :
    "... with a reservation regarding Article 66 so that the recourse to judgement or to arbitration should be preceded by agreement between the two countries concerned."

  • SENEGAL
    Sitoutumispäivä: 11.04.1986 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • SERBIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 12.03.2001 VS
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.04.1992
  • SLOVAKIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 28.05.1993 VS
    Voimaantulopäivä: 01.01.1993
  • SLOVENIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 06.07.1992 VS
    Voimaantulopäivä: 25.06.1991
  • SUDAN
    Sitoutumispäivä: 18.04.1990 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • SURINAM
    Sitoutumispäivä: 31.01.1991 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 02.03.1991
  • SVEITSI
    Sitoutumispäivä: 07.05.1990 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • SYYRIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 02.10.1970 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
    Varauma:

    A-Acceptance of this Convention by the Syrian Arab Republic and ratification of it by its Government shall in no way signify recognition of Israel and cannot have as a result the establishment with the latter of any contact governed by the provisions of this Convention.
    B-The Syrian Arab Republic considers that article 81 is not in conformity with the aims and purposes of the Convention in that it does not allow all States, without distinction or discrimination, to become parties to it.
    C-The Government of the Syrian Arab Republic does not in any case accept the non-applicability of the principle of a funda- mental change of circumstances with regard to treaties es- tablishing boundaries, referred to in article 62, paragraph 2 (a), inasmuch as it regards this as a flagrant violation of an obligatory norm which forms part of general international law and which recognizes the right of peoples to self-determination.
    D-The Government of the Syrian Arab Republic interprets the provisions in article 52 as follows:
    The expression "the threat or use of force" used in this article extends also to the employment of economic, political, military and psychological coercion and to all types of coercion constraining a State to conclude a treaty against its wishes or its interests.
    E-The accession of the Syrian Arab Republic to this Convention and the ratification of it by its Government shall not apply to the Annex to the Convention, which concerns obligatory conciliation.

  • TADZHIKISTAN
    Sitoutumispäivä: 06.05.1996 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 05.06.1996
  • TANSANIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 12.04.1976 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
    Varauma:

    "Article 66 of the Convention shall not be applied to the United Republic of Tanzania by any State which enters a reservation on any provision of part V or the whole of that part of the Convention."

  • TANSKA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 01.06.1976 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
    Varauma:

    As between itself and any State which formulates, wholly or in part, a reservation relating to the provisions of article 66 of the Convention concerning the compulsory settlement of certain disputes, Denmark will not consider itself bound by those provisions of part V of the Convention, according to which the procedures for settlement set forth in article 66 are not to apply in the event of reservations formulated by other States.

  • TOGO
    Sitoutumispäivä: 28.12.1979 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • TSHEKKI
    Sitoutumispäivä: 22.02.1993 VS
    Voimaantulopäivä: 01.01.1993
  • TUNISIA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 23.06.1971 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
    Varauma:

    The dispute referred to in article 66 (a) requires the consent of all parties thereto in order to be submitted to the International Court of Justice for a decision.

  • TURKMENISTAN
    Sitoutumispäivä: 04.01.1996 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 03.02.1996
  • UKRAINA
    Sitoutumispäivä: 14.05.1986 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
    Varauma:

    The Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 66 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and declares that, in order for any dispute among the Contracting Parties concerning the application or the interpretation of articles 53 or 64 to be submitted to the International Court of Justice for a decision or for any dispute concerning the application or interpretation of any other articles in Part V of the Convention to be submitted for consideration by the Conciliation Commission, the consent of all the parties to the dispute is required in each separate case, and that the conciliators constituting the Conciliation Commission may only be persons appointed by the parties to the dispute by common consent.
    The Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic will consider that it is not obligated by the provisions of article 20, paragraph 3 or of article 45 (b) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, since they are contrary to established international practice.
    Declaration:
    The Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic declares that it reserves the right to take any measures to safeguard its interests in the event of the non-observance by other States of the provisions of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.

  • UNKARI
    Sitoutumispäivä: 19.06.1987 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • URUGUAY
    Sitoutumispäivä: 05.03.1982 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
  • UUSI-SEELANTI
    Sitoutumispäivä: 04.08.1971 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
    Varauma:

    Declaration:
    The Government of New Zealand declares its understanding that nothing in article 66 of the Convention is intended to exclude the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice where such jurisdiction exists under the provisions of any treaty in force binding the parties with regard to the settlement of disputes. In relations to states parties to the Vienna Convention which accept as compulsory the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, the Government of New Zealand declares that it will not regard the provisions of article 66 of the Vienna Convention as providing "some other method of peaceful settlement" within the meaning of this phrase where it appears in the declaration of the Government of New Zealand accepting as compulsory the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, which was deposited with the Secretary-General of the League of Nations on 8 April 1940."

  • UZBEKISTAN
    Sitoutumispäivä: 12.07.1995 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 11.08.1995
  • VALKO-VENÄJÄ
    Sitoutumispäivä: 01.05.1986 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
    Varauma:

    The Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 66 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and declares that, in order for any dispute among the Contracting Parties concerning the application or the interpretation of articles 53 or 64 to be submitted to the International Court of Justice for a decision or for any dispute concerning the application or interpretation of any other articles in Part V of the Convention to be submitted for consideration by the Conciliation Commission, the consent of all the parties to the dispute is required in each separate case, and that the conciliators constituting the Conciliation Commission may only be persons appointed by the parties to the dispute by common consent.
    The Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic will consider that it is not obligated by the provisions of article 20, paragraph 3 or of article 45 (b) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, since they are contrary to established international practice.
    Declaration:
    The Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic declares that it reserves the right to take any measures to safeguard its interests in the event of the non-observance by other States of the provisions of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.

  • VATIKAANI
    Sitoutumispäivä: 25.02.1977 R
    Voimaantulopäivä: 27.01.1980
  • VENÄJÄ
    Sitoutumispäivä: 29.04.1986 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: -
    Varauma:

    The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics does not consider itself bound by the provisions of article 66 of the Vienna Con- vention on the Law of Treaties and declares that, in order for any dispute among the Contracting Parties concerning the application or the interpretation of articles 53 or 64 to be submitted to the International Court of Justice for a decision or for any dispute concerning the application or interpretation of any other articles in Part V of the Convention to be submitted for consideration by the Conciliation Commission, the consent of all the parties to the dispute is required in each separate case, and that the conciliators constituting the Conciliation Commission may only be persons appointed by the parties to the dispute by common consent.
    The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics will consider that it is not obligated by the provisions of article 20, paragraph 3 or of article 45 (b) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, since they are contrary to established international practice.
    Declaration:
    The Union of Soviet Socialist Republics declares that it reserves the right to take any measures to safeguard its interests in the event of the non-observance by other States of the provisions of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties.

  • VIETNAM
    Sitoutumispäivä: 10.10.2001 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 09.11.2001
    Varauma:

    Reservation:
    "Acceeding to this Convention, the Socialist Republic of Vietnam makes its reservation to article 66 of the said Convention."

  • VIRO
    Sitoutumispäivä: 21.10.1991 L
    Voimaantulopäivä: 20.11.1991

Finlex ® on oikeusministeriön omistama oikeudellisen aineiston julkinen ja maksuton Internet-palvelu.
Finlexin sisällön tuottaa ja sitä ylläpitää Edita Publishing Oy. Oikeusministeriö tai Edita eivät vastaa tietokantojen sisällössä mahdollisesti esiintyvistä virheistä, niiden käytöstä käyttäjälle aiheutuvista välittömistä tai välillisistä vahingoista tai Internet-tietoverkossa esiintyvistä käyttökatkoista tai muista häiriöistä.